Commit bd41e41b authored by Laura A DeCicco's avatar Laura A DeCicco
Browse files

Merge branch 'master' of github.com:USGS-R/dataRetrieval

parents 134f13fe 1c18d425
---
name: New Feature Request
about: Create a report to help us improve
labels: enhancement
---
**Describe a feature you would like to see added**
Please briefly describe a feature you think should be included in this package.
If possible, include an example of how you would like to see the code work:
```r
library(dataRetrieval)
super_cool_feature(x, y)
```
From the above code, what do you expect the output to be?
**Additional context**
Add any other context about the problem here.
---
name: Bug report
about: Create a report to help us improve
title: ''
labels: bug
assignees: ''
---
**Describe the bug**
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
**To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
```r
library(dataRetrieval)
problem_query <- readNWISdv("a","b","c","d")
```
**Expected behavior**
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
**Screenshots**
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
**Session Info**
Please include your session info:
```r
sessionInfo()
#OR preferred:
devtools::session_info()
```
**Additional context**
Add any other context about the problem here.
---
name: New Feature Development
about: Work plan for new features
title: 'Development Work'
labels: enhancement
assignees: ''
---
New features should include all of the following work:
* [ ] Create the function/code
* [ ] Create tests in tests/testthat folder
* [ ] Create help file using roxygen2 above code.
* [ ] Create working examples in help file (via roxygen2)
* [ ] Add to appropriate vignette (or create new one)
* [ ] Add example README
* [ ] Check that `devtools::check()` produces no errors, warnings, or notes
* [ ] Check that `covr::package_coverage()` has not significantly decreased
Feel free to create independent issues for each of these subtasks.
This task should not be considered completed until all of the above boxes are checked, or a reasonable argument is made for ignoring a section (ie...not appropriate for top-level README overview).
---
name: Question
about: Ask a question
title: ''
labels: question
assignees: ''
---
**What is your question?**
A clear and concise description of the question.
**To Reproduce**
If possible, narrow down the question to a `dataRetrieval` query:
```r
library(dataRetrieval)
questionable_query <- readNWISdv("a","b","c","d")
```
**Expected behavior**
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
**Screenshots**
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
**Session Info**
Please include your session info:
```r
sessionInfo()
#OR preferred:
devtools::session_info()
```
**Additional context**
Add any other context about the problem here.
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment