Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
SqDist.md 4.23 KiB
Newer Older
  • Learn to ignore specific revisions
  • Geomagnetic Secular Variation, Solar Quiet, and Disturbance
    
    ===========================================================
    
    
    E. Joshua Rigler <[erigler@usgs.gov](mailto:erigler@usgs.gov)>
    
    The magnetic field measured at a given point on Earth’s surface is often
    
    assumed to be static, but in reality it is constantly changing, and on a
    variety of time scales associated with distinct physical phenomena. These are:
    
    - Secular variation (SV) - slow variations in the geomagnetic field associated
      with changes in Earth's interior.
    - Solar quiet variation (SQ) - shorter-term periodic variations in the
      geomagnetic field associated with Earth's rotation beneath quasi-static
      geospace electric currents that are phase-locked with the sun.
    - Disturbance (DIST) - shorter-term non-periodic variations in the geomagnetic
      field, typically associated with episodic events like geomagnetic storms and
      substorms.
    
    SV is fairly easily separated from higher frequency variations using low-order
    polynomials to *detrend* the data. SQ and DIST have similar time scales, and
    are therefore more difficult to separate. Fourier series can be fit to data to
    estimate SQ, which works well in non-real time situations. This approach
    suffers in real time situations for both practical and theoretical reasons
    that we won't discuss in detail here.
    
    
    ## Exponential Smoothing
    
    Real time decomposition of geomagnetic time series into SV, SQ, and DIST should
    explicitly acknowledge and address time-causal nature of real time
    observations. To this end, we employ a form of exponential smoothing, with
    "seasonal" adjustments, that updates estimates of SV and SQ based only on past
    observations, weighting older observations less and less as time passes. In
    effect, SV and SQ adapt to changing conditions at a predictable rate that can
    be specified by the user.
    
    In addition, this approach is significantly less computationally expensive than
    traditional Fourier techniques. No Fourier transform of months-to-years-long
    data series is required, and memory requirements are comparably reduced, since
    a description of the state of the system at any given moment is only 1+m, where
    m is the number of data points in an SQ cycle, nominally 1 day.
    
    Finally, exponential smoothing is generally more robust to common issues with
    real time data series; it easily extrapolates SV and SQ across gaps in the
    data; it provides a running estimate of the variance of DIST, which can be used
    to set a threshold for spike detection; and it adjusts SV to accommodate DC
    offsets at rate specified by the user.
    
    Usage and expected output for this algorithm is shown in this
    
    [Solar Quiet and Disturbance (Holt Winters)](SqDist.ipynb) IPython Notebook
    
    
    
    ## References
    
     - Archibald, B.C., and A.B. Koehler (2003), [Normalization of seasonal
       factors in Winters'
       methods](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207001001170),
       Int. J. of Forecasting, 19(1), 143-148.
    
     - Bodenham, D., and N. Adams (2013), [Technical Report: Continuous changepoint
       monitoring of data streams using
       adaptive estimation](http://wwwf.imperial.ac.uk/~dab10/techreport.pdf), ...
       (Submitted to Elsevier; also a longer thesis is available from Imperial
       College London)
    
     - Byrd, R. H., P. Lu, and J. Nocedal (1995), [A limited memory algorithm for
       bound constrained
       optimization](http://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/0916069), SIAM J.
       Scientific and Stat. Computing, 16(5), 1190-1208.
    
     - Gardner, E. S. (2006), [Exonential smoothing: The state of the art --
       Part II](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207006000392),
       Int. J. of Forecasting, 22(4), 637-666.
    
     - Hyndman, R. J., A.B. Koehler, J.K. Ord, and R.D. Snyder (2005), [Prediction
       intervals for exponential smoothing using two new classes of state space
       models](http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/for.938/abstract), J.
       Forecast., 24(1), 17-37.
    
    
     - Hyndman, Rob J., and George Athana­sopou­los. "Forecasting: Principles and
       Practice." Forecasting: Principles and Practice. OTexts: Online,
       Open-Access Textbooks, May 2012. Web. <https://www.otexts.org/fpp>.
    
    
     - Hyndman, R. J., and G. Athanasopoulos (2013), [Forecasting: principles and
       practice](https://www.otexts.org/fpp), OTexts.