Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Rupture-Scaling-Relations.md 4.56 KiB
Newer Older
  • Learn to ignore specific revisions
  • Powers, Peter M.'s avatar
    Powers, Peter M. committed
    # Rupture-Scaling Relations
    
    Rupture scaling models describe relationships between rupture geometry and magnitude. Such models
    are used in a NSHM to:
    
    Powers, Peter M.'s avatar
    Powers, Peter M. committed
    * Compute an expected magnitude from a rupture geometry.
    * Compute the size (length or area) of a rupture from a magnitude.
    * Compute point-source distance corrections (optimization for unknown strike)
    
    
    Powers, Peter M.'s avatar
    Powers, Peter M. committed
    Rupture scaling model implementations typically impose restrictions on rupture aspect ratio.
    
    Powers, Peter M.'s avatar
    Powers, Peter M. committed
    
    ## Magnitude-Scaling Relationships
    
    | Region             | Reference                  | Tectonic Setting | Type         |
    |:------------------ |:-------------------------  |:------------ |:---------------- |
    | WellsCoppersmith-L | Wells & Coppersmith (1994) | active crust | magnitude-length |
    | EllsworthB         | WGCEP (2002)               | active crust | magnitude-area   |
    | EllsworthB-SqrtL¹  | Shaw (2013b)               | active crust | magnitude-area   |
    | HanksBakun-08      | Hanks & Bakun (2008)       | active crust | magnitude-area   |
    | Shaw09mod          | Shaw (2013a, 2013b)        | active crust | magnitude-area   |
    | Shaw09mod-CSD¹     | Shaw (2013a, 2013b)        | active crust | magnitude-area   |
    | Somerville-01      | Somerville et al. (2001)   | stable crust | magnitude-area   |
    | Strasser-10        | Strasser et al. (2010)     | subduction   | magnitude-length |
    | Murotani-08        | Murotani et al. (2008)     | subduction   | magnitude-length |
    | Papazachos-04      | Papazachos et al. (2004)   | subduction   | magnitude-length |
    | Youngs-97          | Youngs et al. (1997)       | subduction   | magnitude-length |
    
    ¹ UCERF3 uses rupture scaling relationships to also balance slip rate when computing rupture
    rates. These models consider alternative slip-length scaling relations relative to the default
    computed from rupture area and moment; see Field et al. (2014) for details.
    
    ² Also referred to as the 'Geomatrix' relation
    
    ## References
    
    Hanks TC, and Bakun WH (2008) M- log A observations of recent large earthquakes. Bulletin of the
    Seismological Society of America 98(1): 490–494.
    
    Murotani S, Miyake H, Koketsu K (2008) Scaling of characterized slip models for plate-boundary
    earthquakes. Earth, Planets, and Space 60(?): 987–981.
    
    Papazachos BC, Scordilis EM, Panagiotopoulos DG, Papazachos CB, and Karakaisis GF (2004) Global
    relations between seismic fault parameters and moment magnitudes of earthquakes. Bulletin of the
    Geological Society of Greece 36(?): 1482–1489.
    
    Shaw BE (2013a) Earthquake surface slip-length data is fit by constant stress drop and is useful
    for seismic hazard analysis, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103(2A): 876-893.
    
    Shaw BE (2013b) Appendix E: Evaluation of magnitude-scaling relationships and depth of rupture:
    Recommendation for UCERF3, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 2013-1165-E, and California Geol.
    Surv. Special Rept. 228-E.
    
    Somerville P, Collins N, Abrahamson NA, Graves R, and Saikia C (2001) Ground motion attenuation
    relations for the Central and Eastern United States—Final report, June 30, 2001: Report to U.S.
    Geological Survey for award 99HQGR0098, 38 p.
    
    Strasser FO, Arango MC, and Bommer JJ (2010) Scaling of the source dimensions of interface and
    intraslab subduction-zone earthquakes with moment magnitude: Seismological Research Letters
    81(?): 941–950.
    
    Wells DL and Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length,
    rupture width, and surface displacements: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,
    84(?): 974–1002.
    
    Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP) (2003). Earthquake probabilities in
    the San Francisco Bay region: 2002– 2031, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Report 2003-214.
    
    Youngs RR, Chiou B-SJ, Silva WJ, and Humphrey JR (1997) Strong ground motion attenuation
    relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters 68(?): 58–73.
    
    ## Related Pages
    
    * [Hazard Model](./Hazard-Model.md#hazard-model)
      * [Model Structure](./Model-Structure.md#model-structure)
      * [Model Files](./Model-Files.md#model-files)
      * [Source Types](./Source-Types.md#source-types)
      * [Magnitude Frequency Distributions (MFDs)](./Magnitude-Frequency-Distributions.md#magnitude-frequency-distributions)
      * [Rupture Scaling Relations](./Rupture-Scaling-Relations.md#rupture-scaling-relations)
      * [Ground Motion Models (GMMs)](./Ground-Motion-Models.md#ground-motion-models)
    * [**Documentation Index**](../README.md)
    
    ![USGS logo](./images/usgs-icon.png)  [U.S. Geological Survey](https://www.usgs.gov)
    
    National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project ([NSHMP](https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/))