Cascadia interface source tested at all PacNW test sites. All results match very well, as hazard curves and 2% in 50 yrs UHRS. Small differences (<0.1%) at a couple of sites (Bellingham and Everett, WA) at hazard curve tails. Result compilation on OneDrive.
tested single branch (top, full rupture)
tested full Cascadia logic tree with all GMMs and uncertainties
CEUS Zone sources match perfectly, except for Charlevoix. This is due to the rate-table optimization with is applied to Charlevoix because it does not have a fixed strike like the other zone sources.
Grid source hazard results match very well across CEUS - perfectly at most sites, but very small differences across the south (e.g. up to a max of ~0.004% in Jacksonville, FL).
CEUS gridded source tests: All sscn sources and the usgs/craton source match exactly. Slight diffs in usgs/extended-margin and usgs/default most likely arise from 5 sites shifting between the two zones. For further investigation/correction.